Introduction: A Strategic Earthquake in the Red Sea
On December 26, 2025, a diplomatic tremor shook the foundations of the Horn of Africa. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed a “Jerusalem Declaration” with Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi “Irro,” President of the breakaway region of Somaliland, extending Israel’s formal recognition to a territory that has sought statehood for over three decades without success
. This move, presented as an expansion of the “spirit of the Abraham Accords,” immediately triggered a firestorm of condemnation across the Arab world and Africa
. It is a calculated, high-risk strategic gambit by Israel, rooted in a revived “periphery doctrine,” aimed at piercing its regional isolation and securing a foothold on the critical Bab al-Mandeb Strait. However, far from being a simple bilateral accord, this recognition threatens to exacerbate existing fault lines, accelerate militarization, and plunge one of the world’s most fragile regions into a new era of proxy confrontation.
From Secret Diplomacy to Public Declaration: The Anatomy of a Deal
The official announcement was the culmination of months of clandestine diplomacy, spearheaded by Israel’s security establishment. Israeli media reported that President Irro undertook a secret visit to Israel in October 2025, where he met with Netanyahu, Mossad chief David Barnea, and Defense Minister Israel Katz
. This visit underscores the security-centric nature of the relationship from its inception. For Somaliland, a de facto independent entity since 1991 that has operated its own government and held democratic elections without international recognition, this deal represents a historic, long-sought breakthrough. For Israel, it is a transactional agreement: diplomatic legitimacy granted in exchange for strategic access
.
The move coincides with a significant geopolitical window. The election of Irro in late 2024, a former Somali diplomat, shifted Somaliland’s foreign policy toward an assertive search for recognition, creating a willing partner for Israel
. Simultaneously, Israel faces unprecedented regional isolation following the Gaza conflict and perceives a direct threat from Iran-aligned Houthi forces in Yemen, who have targeted shipping in the Red Sea. As analyst Mark Dubowitz noted, Somaliland offers “stability, ports, intelligence access and a non-Iranian platform on the Red Sea”
.
Decoding Israel’s Strategic Imperatives
The recognition is not an act of altruism but a cornerstone of a modernized Israeli security doctrine. The Horn of Africa has re-emerged as a vital theater in the broader Middle Eastern power struggle.
-
Countering the Houthi and Iranian Threat: Somaliland’s 850-kilometer coastline along the Gulf of Aden provides Israel with a platform directly adjacent to Yemen
. Israeli strategic thinkers have outlined clear objectives: establishing early-warning radar systems to monitor missile and drone launches, creating a potential launch point for special operations against Houthi targets, and denying Iran dominance over southern Red Sea maritime routes
-
. This would directly address the threat profile that has evolved since the Gaza war, providing a forward-operating position far from Israel’s borders.
-
Securing the Maritime Chokepoint: Control and surveillance over the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, through which 12% of global trade passes, is a paramount strategic prize
. An Israeli presence in Somaliland, particularly if it includes a military facility as widely speculated, would grant it leverage over this critical artery, impacting global energy markets and shipping lanes
-
. It also positions Israel as a security guarantor for commercial traffic, a role it is eager to assume.
-
Forging a New Regional Axis: The deal is not bilateral in isolation; it actively constructs a new geopolitical axis. Israel has concurrently deepened ties with Ethiopia, a landlocked regional power seeking reliable sea access
. A trilateral axis of Israel, Ethiopia, and Somaliland is now crystallizing, with the expanded port of Berbera serving as Ethiopia’s potential outlet
-
. This axis directly challenges the interests of Egypt—which views Ethiopian sea access as a threat in the context of Nile River disputes—and reshapes the balance of power in the Horn.
-
Breaking Diplomatic Isolation: Following the Gaza war, traditional avenues for normalization with major Arab states like Saudi Arabia have stalled
. By recognizing Somaliland and bringing it into the Abraham Accords framework, Netanyahu can claim a diplomatic victory and demonstrate Israel’s ability to forge new partnerships with Muslim-majority entities, however unconventional
-
. It is a stark attempt to pivot from a position of isolation to one of offensive diplomacy.
The Architecture of a Strategic Partnership: Bases, Economics, and Ambiguity
The declared cooperation extends beyond diplomacy into tangible security and economic domains, though key operational details remain deliberately opaque.
-
Military Footprint: While unconfirmed officially, multiple reports indicate that plans for an Israeli military base—potentially its largest overseas—are central to the agreement
. The port city of Berbera, with its UAE-funded deep-sea port and extended runway, is a leading candidate, offering direct logistical links to Ethiopia. The historic port of Zeila, closer to the Bab al-Mandeb, is another option prized for surveillance capabilities
-
. Such a base would transform the regional security calculus.
-
Economic Lifeline: For the financially strained Somaliland government, Israeli investment is a crucial incentive. Netanyahu has pledged cooperation in agriculture (notably desert-farming and drip irrigation technology), health, and technology
. By applying its expertise in arid agriculture, Israel aims to bolster food security in Somaliland, thereby granting the Irro government performance-based legitimacy. Furthermore, Israel sees the “Berbera Corridor” into Ethiopia as a trade route for its technology firms into African markets
-
.
-
The Shadow of Gaza Displacement: Lingering in the background is the controversial and widely condemned notion of third-country resettlement for Palestinians from Gaza. Reports in early 2025 suggested U.S. and Israeli officials had explored locations including Somalia
. While both Somaliland and Somali authorities have denied any involvement in such discussions, the timing of Israel’s recognition has fueled suspicions in Mogadishu and across the Arab world that this may be a long-term objective. A joint statement by over twenty countries explicitly rejected any link between the recognition and “attempts to forcibly expel the Palestinian people”
-
.
A Continent and a Region in Outrage: The International Backlash
The reaction from the international community has been swift, severe, and nearly unanimous in its condemnation, highlighting the profound challenge Israel’s move poses to established norms.
-
Somalia’s Existential Stance: The Federal Government of Somalia has declared the recognition “unlawful” and a “deliberate attack” on its sovereignty
. It has initiated steps to activate a joint defense agreement with Egypt, signaling a move from diplomacy toward potential military preparedness. Mogadishu views this as an existential threat that could embolden other separatist movements within its borders, such as Puntland
-
.
-
African Union’s Principled Rejection: The African Union (AU) has firmly rejected the move, invoking the sacrosanct 1964 Cairo Resolution that upholds the inviolability of colonial-era borders
. The AU fears a “domino effect” that could ignite secessionist claims across the continent, from Nigeria to Cameroon, and even within Ethiopia itself
-
. This principle of territorial integrity is a cornerstone of the post-colonial African order.
-
Arab and Islamic Solidarity: A broad coalition has rallied behind Somalia. The Arab League, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and individual states including Egypt, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan have all issued statements condemning the recognition as a violation of international law and Somali sovereignty
. Türkiye, which maintains its largest overseas military base in Mogadishu, called it an “irresponsible act” by a government with a “dark record of genocide and occupation”
-
.
-
The U.S. and Western Ambivalence: The Western response has been cautious. The United States, through the State Department, reiterated its recognition of Somalia’s territorial integrity
. President Donald Trump offered a characteristically ambiguous response, questioning if anyone knew what Somaliland was but expressing interest in its offer of port access. The European Union called for respect for Somalia’s unity and meaningful dialogue
-
. This lack of enthusiastic support from Israel’s traditional allies underscores the deal’s destabilizing potential.
Risks and Implications: Lighting the Powder Keg
The recognition, while a tactical win for Netanyahu, carries catastrophic strategic risks that could overwhelm its intended benefits.
-
Accelerated Regional Militarization: The Horn of Africa is now starkly divided into two emerging blocs: an Israel-Ethiopia-Somaliland axis versus a Egypt-Somalia-Türkiye-Djibouti (and potentially other Gulf state) alignment
-
. This polarization will inevitably lead to an arms race and the establishment of rival military facilities, transforming the region into a crowded arena for great power and regional proxy competition.
-
Destabilization of Somalia and Emboldenment of Al-Shabaab: The greatest immediate danger is the potential collapse of Somalia’s fragile federal government. Perceived international betrayal could radicalize political discourse in Mogadishu. Furthermore, the militant group Al-Shabaab could weaponize this issue, framing itself as the defender of Somali sovereignty against foreign (and Israeli) intervention, potentially boosting its recruitment and legitimacy
-
.
-
Erosion of International Norms: By unilaterally recognizing a breakaway region, Israel is challenging a fundamental principle of the post-World War II international order: the territorial integrity of states. If this precedent is seen to succeed, it could invite similar actions by other states in separatist conflicts worldwide, unleashing a wave of instability.
-
Direct Confrontation in the Red Sea: An Israeli military presence in Somaliland would place its assets directly in the line of fire from the Houthis in Yemen, raising the risk of a direct and escalating conflict in the Red Sea corridor. It also increases the likelihood of accidental clashes with the naval forces of other regional powers, including Iran.
Conclusion: A High-Stakes Game with No Winners
Israel’s recognition of Somaliland is a bold, realist maneuver born of a sense of siege and strategic opportunity. It successfully secures a prized geographic position and creates a new regional partnership. However, it fundamentally misjudges the resilience of pan-African solidarity and the depth of Arab and Islamic commitment to Somalia’s sovereignty.
The move is less about “nation-building” in Africa and more about establishing a forward military and intelligence bastion. In doing so, Israel has traded a degree of strategic depth for immense political and security liability. It has injected a volatile new variable into an already complex region of civil wars, terrorism, and interstate rivalry. The likely outcome is not a stable new alliance but a dangerously militarized standoff that threatens the security of vital global shipping lanes and risks triggering a broader regional conflagration.
The international community, particularly the United States and European powers, must move beyond cautious statements. They must actively mediate to prevent an arms race, reinforce the AU’s position on territorial integrity, and support inclusive dialogue between Mogadishu and Hargeisa. The alternative is to watch as the Horn of Africa, once again, becomes a theater for external powers’ conflicts, with the Somali people paying the highest price. Netanyahu’s gambit may have changed the map in Jerusalem’s situation room, but on the ground in the Horn of Africa, it is lighting a fuse that threatens to consume what little stability remains.
About the Author
