In December 2025, Israel’s Ministry of Defense announced that it would deliver the “Iron Beam” high-power laser interception system to the Israel Defense Forces by the end of the month, claiming that this system would “fundamentally change the rules of the battlefield.” Meanwhile, data from the Economic Department of the Israeli Embassy in China shows that in the first 10 months of 2024, the financing amount for high-tech startups in the country has exceeded 8 billion US dollars, far surpassing the 6.9 billion US dollars for the entire year of 2023. Amid ongoing regional conflicts and geopolitical blockades, this country, with a land area of only 22,000 square kilometers and a population of less than 10 million, has consistently maintained military hegemony in the Middle East and world-leading innovation capabilities. The secrets of its strength lie not only in the smoke-filled battlefield practices but also in the genes of institutional design, and more importantly, in the precise integration of global resources.
I. Military Technology: Closed-Loop Innovation from Combat Needs to Rule Reconstruction
Israel’s military strength has never been a mere accumulation of technologies, but is built on an efficient closed loop of “combat feedback – rapid R&D – battlefield verification.” In July 2024, during the street fighting in the Gaza Strip, the newly commissioned “Tarnagol” (meaning “rooster”) UAV demonstrated unique value in its first combat deployment. Developed by Robotican, this equipment adopts a “wheel-in-aircraft” design, enabling it to conduct aerial reconnaissance while moving on the ground in GPS-weak areas such as buildings and tunnels. It establishes communication links through “chain relay” tactics, ensuring situational awareness for special forces in complex environments. From receiving military support in 2023 to mass deployment in 2024, this cross-domain unmanned system took less than two years to develop, perfectly embodying the core logic of Israel’s military industry: “demand-driven and rapid iteration.”
The “Iron Beam” laser system, scheduled for delivery at the end of 2025, is also a product of combat pressure. Facing hundreds of rocket attacks from Hamas and Hezbollah, the traditional “Iron Dome” system, although boasting an interception rate of over 90%, is highly cost-inefficient when countering crude rockets that cost only 800 US dollars, with each interception missile costing 35,000 to 50,000 US dollars. In sharp contrast, the “Iron Beam” has an interception cost of just 3.5 US dollars per shot. With a power of 100 kilowatts, it can focus on a coin-sized area and continuously irradiate targets. In the operation to intercept Hezbollah drones in November 2024, the low-power version achieved a record of shooting down 35 drones.
However, this innovation is not without shortcomings. Military experts point out that the theoretical 10-kilometer range of the “Iron Beam” will be significantly reduced in common Middle Eastern weather conditions such as sandstorms and dense fog. Moreover, it can only intercept one target at a time, limiting its effectiveness against saturation attacks. Compared with China’s “Liaoyuan-1,” which has a power of 200 kilowatts and a range of 20 kilometers, Israel’s claim of being the “world’s first deployed” is more of a tactical publicity. This pragmatic philosophy of “good enough is optimal” is also reflected in the fifth-generation “Sea Breaker” missile. Equipped with an AI decision-making algorithm and stealth design, this missile has a standoff strike capability of 300 kilometers, suitable for the Israeli Navy’s light warships. However, the reliability of its passive guidance system still needs combat verification.
Israel’s real advantage in military technology lies in concentrating limited resources on core pain points. Its defense budget in 2025 reached 30 billion US dollars, accounting for 6.8% of GDP. Although far lower than that of countries like Saudi Arabia, the R&D investment ratio is as high as 25%, with over 80% flowing into projects directly related to combat. This model of “nurturing R&D through warfare” has enabled Israel’s military industry to form a unique path of “miniaturization, intelligence, and multi-purpose.” Alone, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems holds more than 7,000 patents, with products exported to over 130 countries worldwide.
II. Innovation Ecosystem: Resonant Frequency of Venture Capital and National Strategy
Breakthroughs in military technology are just the tip of the iceberg of Israel’s innovation capabilities. In October 2024, Israeli cybersecurity company Armis raised 200 million US dollars in a single round of financing, and payment platform Melio raised 150 million US dollars. The total financing for startups in the first 10 months reached 8 billion US dollars, achieving a strong recovery since 2023. Behind this achievement is the world’s densest innovation ecosystem network – with 3.2 tech startups per 1,000 people, 1.8 times that of Silicon Valley.
The core of this ecosystem is a dual-drive model of “national guidance + market motivation.” The “Israeli Innovation Act” promoted in 2024 increased the proportion of university R&D funding to 1.2% of GDP and provided full scholarships for top global talents through the “Excellence Scholar Program,” with the acceptance rate for students from China’s 985 universities increasing by 37%. More importantly, the reform of the education system: universities such as Tel Aviv University implement a dual-track system of “40% theory + 60% practice.” Computer science students must complete the incubation of 3 entrepreneurial projects, and bioengineering students are required to participate in joint military-industrial R&D. This mechanism of incorporating “entrepreneurial ability” into academic credit assessment cultivates innovation genes from the source.
The in-depth involvement of venture capital accelerates the commercialization of innovative achievements. Israel’s venture capital industry features “government guidance and universal participation”: the government-established Yeda Technology Transfer Company provides initial funds for university patents, while mature projects are taken over by private venture capital. The newly added “Technology Innovation Points System” in 2024 has further connected capital and talents – core members of startup teams that have received 500,000 US dollars in venture capital can directly apply for temporary green cards. This mechanism has fostered a unique “failure-tolerant culture” in Israel. Data shows that the failure rate of Israeli startups is as high as 60%, but investors are still willing to continue investing because the average return rate of successful projects can reach over 30 times.
The synergy of industrial clusters further amplifies innovation efficiency. Around the “Silicon Wadi” near Tel Aviv, more than 2,500 tech companies have gathered, forming a complete industrial chain from chip design and software development to system integration. PropTech company DoorLoop, which raised 100 million US dollars in financing in 2024, its core technology originated from the topographic mapping algorithm of the Israeli Defense Forces’ Unit 8200; the encryption technology of cloud backup company Eon was derived from Mossad’s intelligence transmission system. This transformation of military technology to civilian applications forms a virtuous cycle of “defense needs nurture technology – civilian market realizes value – feedback R&D investment.”
It is worth noting that Israel’s innovation ecosystem is facing new challenges. Its GDP declined by 2.5% year-on-year to 512.18 billion US dollars in 2023, and regional conflicts have led some multinational companies to relocate their R&D centers. To address this, Israel launched the “Digital Nomad Visa” in 2024 to attract remote workers with an annual income of over 500,000 shekels. At the same time, it reduced the threshold for real estate investment immigration from 1.5 million shekels to 1 million shekels, maintaining the inflow of talents and capital through policy dividends.
III. Talent Strategy: Two-Way Empowerment of Global Networks and Local Cultivation
The foundation of Israel’s innovation capability lies in the ultimate integration of global talents and the systematic cultivation of local talents. In August 2024, the Israeli government passed a new bill, implementing an “advance certification” system for immigrants with professional qualification certificates and establishing a unified licensing center. This shortened the employment access time for foreign professional talents from 18-24 months to 3 months. This reform specifically addresses the long-standing talent bottleneck in Israel – data shows that 25% of Western immigrants hold professional qualifications, but the complicated certification process leaves them idle for an average of 1.5 years before they can work.
For high-end talents, Israel offers “customized” conditions. STEM graduates with an annual salary of 380,000 shekels (approximately 680,000 RMB) can directly apply for permanent residency; scholars who have published 3 SCI papers can obtain green cards through the “fast track” in 6 months; core members of startup teams supported by venture capital can obtain residency without meeting the work experience requirement. This strategy of “recruiting talents regardless of formalities” has enabled Israel to gather top global minds in fields such as artificial intelligence and biomedicine – the Hebrew University of Jerusalem alone has 10 Nobel Prize laureates, ranking first in the world in terms of the number of Nobel Prize laureates per capita.
The cultivation of local talents leverages the unique advantages of the “universal military service” defense system. Israeli law stipulates that citizens aged 18 must serve in the military – 3 years for men and 2 years for women, with female soldiers accounting for 41% of the military. During their service, approximately 10% of soldiers enter elite units in intelligence, communications, and R&D. Among them, Unit 8200 is known as “Israel’s Silicon Valley cradle,” having nurtured a large number of tech elites including the founder of Waze navigation. This military service experience not only hones young people’s stress resistance and teamwork skills but also accumulates valuable technical experience through combat projects.
The key to talent retention lies in building an ecosystem for “value realization.” Israel provides full-chain support for talents in “idea – R&D – monetization” through low tax rates (only 12% corporate income tax for tech companies), a sound intellectual property protection system (patent approval cycle shortened to 6 months), and abundant innovation and entrepreneurship competitions. Data in 2024 shows that the average annual salary of Israeli tech practitioners reaches 520,000 shekels, far exceeding the national average. Moreover, 70% of startup founders choose to continue entrepreneurship rather than sell their companies. This “entrepreneurship-addicted” cultural atmosphere maximizes the vitality of talents.
IV. Geopolitical Game: The Dialectical Unity of Security Dilemma and External Support
Israel’s strength has always been overshadowed by the “security dilemma” and deeply dependent on external strategic support. The United States, as its core ally, provides over 3 billion US dollars in military aid annually and has used its veto power 41 times in the UN Security Council to defend Israel. This support is not merely “alliance friendship” but based on the precise layout of the US Middle East strategy after the Cold War – Israel, as the US “bridgehead” in the Middle East, undertakes the strategic functions of containing Iran and balancing the Arab world. In 2024, the US-deployed THAAD anti-missile system in Israel achieved data interconnection with Israel’s Arrow-3 system, forming an anti-missile network covering the Middle East and further consolidating Israel’s security advantages.
Israel, in turn, transforms the security dilemma into strategic advantages through “proxy wars” and “precision strikes.” During the conflict with Hezbollah in November 2024, Israel deployed the “Iron Beam” system to intercept drones while using Mossad to precisely destroy Hezbollah’s weapons depots. This not only demonstrated the combat effectiveness of new weapons but also avoided large-scale involvement of ground troops. This cyclic strategy of “deterrence – strike – negotiation” has allowed Israel to take the initiative in long-term confrontations with opponents such as Hamas and Hezbollah while controlling the scale of conflicts to avoid full-scale war.
In diplomacy, Israel skillfully uses the three weapons of “religious identity,” “victim narrative,” and “technology diplomacy” to break through blockades. In 2024, Israel deepened its relations under the framework of the Abraham Accords by exporting the “Iron Dome” system and agricultural technologies to the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. At the same time, it provided medical equipment to 20 African countries under the name of “anti-epidemic cooperation” in exchange for their support in the UN. This “technology for diplomacy” strategy has gradually lifted Israel’s isolation, and it has now established diplomatic relations with 164 countries.
However, this geopolitical advantage also hides risks. Israel’s tough policies have led to the continuous accumulation of regional hatred – the youth unemployment rate in the Gaza Strip reached 60% in 2024, providing breeding ground for extremist organizations. Excessive reliance on US support limits its diplomatic flexibility – in 2024, its follow-up to the US in sanctioning Iran led to a 12% decline in trade volume with emerging markets such as India and Turkey. The settlement expansion policy promoted by the far-right government has triggered widespread international condemnation, eroding Israel’s moral authority.
Conclusion: The Paradox of a Crisis-Driven Powerful Nation
From the upcoming deployment of the “Iron Beam” laser system to the financing boom of startups, Israel’s code of strength can be summarized as “crisis-driven systematic innovation” – driven by national security needs, nurturing innovation genes through education reform, accelerating achievement transformation with venture capital, breaking through resource constraints through global talent networks, and obtaining external support through geopolitical games. This ability to convert survival pressure into development momentum has enabled Israel to build a global tech highland in the Middle Eastern desert.
Yet the paradox of strength is equally clear: the “security illusion” brought by military superiority has trapped Israel in a cycle of violence, with the 2.5% GDP decline in 2023 already reflecting the economic costs of conflicts. The innovation ecosystem’s over-reliance on global capital and talents faces resilience tests amid the wave of de-globalization. The short-term gains from geopolitical games are consuming long-term strategic space, and the “de-Americanization” trend in the Arab world may shake Israel’s security foundation.
For the Middle East, Israel’s strength is both a threat and an inspiration – it proves that resource-scarce countries can achieve transcendence through institutional innovation, but also warns that strength sustained by military hegemony is unsustainable. As the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: “Violence cannot bring security, and military force cannot forge peace.” If Israel truly wants to achieve long-term stability and security, it may need to transcend the inertia of “crisis-driven” development, build a regional security community under the framework of the two-state solution, and redirect its innovation capabilities from serving military confrontation to promoting regional development. This is the ultimate code of strength.
